<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.mikepope.com/blog/rss/rssComments.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" >
  <channel>
    <title>Jakob Nielsen blog: don't blog - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.mikepope.com/blog/AddComment.aspx?blogid=1779</link>
    <description />
    <copyright>Copyright 2003-2007 Mike Pope </copyright>
    <dc:language>en-US</dc:language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:58:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <generator>mike pope's Web log</generator>
    <webMaster>mike@mikepope.com</webMaster>
        <item>
      <title>Comment by Dave on "Jakob Nielsen blog: don't blog"</title>
      <link>http://encosia.com</link>
      <guid>http://www.mikepope.com/blog/AddComment.aspx?blogid=1779#1779_1719</guid>
      <description>I had exactly the same reaction to his &lt;em&gt;article&lt;/em&gt;.  It came off as pretentious and not very accurate at all.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I normally enjoy all of his usability ideas.  He should really stick to that, instead of soapboxing outside of his niche.</description>
      <dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment by Harry Miller on "Jakob Nielsen blog: don't blog"</title>
      <link>http://blogs.msdn.com/harrymiller</link>
      <guid>http://www.mikepope.com/blog/AddComment.aspx?blogid=1779#1779_1720</guid>
      <description>He does seem to be missing the whole 2.0 idea -- that when bloggers you trust link to an article, they are providing value by helping you filter and find interesting content. Jakob comes across as pretty stuck in the old-media &quot;we produce the content, you consume it and like it&quot; paradigm, whereas nowadays the content is often already out there and the value comes from combining, juxtaposing, and commenting on it.</description>
      <dc:creator>Harry Miller</dc:creator>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>

