About

I'm Mike Pope. I live in the Seattle area. I've been a technical writer and editor for over 30 years. I'm interested in software, language, music, movies, books, motorcycles, travel, and ... well, lots of stuff.

Read more ...

Blog Search


(Supports AND)

Google Ads

Feed

Subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog.

See this post for info on full versus truncated feeds.

Quote

AJAX: Finally, a technology that can be universally applied to solve any problem, except maybe paranoia, since they won't turn javascript on.

— "nate"



Navigation





<October 2014>
SMTWTFS
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

Categories

  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  
  RSS  

Contact

Email me

Blog Statistics

Dates
First entry - 6/27/2003
Most recent entry - 10/16/2014

Totals
Posts - 2312
Comments - 2502
Hits - 1,674,652

Averages
Entries/day - 0.56
Comments/entry - 1.08
Hits/day - 405

Updated every 30 minutes. Last: 4:36 PM Pacific


  06:48 PM

A good post by Eric Lippert titled "Math is Everywhere" in which he posits seven reasons why the study of any subject, and particularly math, is never really a waste of time. His thesis in a nutshell:
"When are we ever going to use this in real life?" has been the cry of bored math students since time immemorial. Though the vast majority mightn't a clue what "real life" entails, it's still a fair question that deserves an answer. Coming up with practical examples of math in real life is a reasonable approach.

But I would go further. I would deny the very implicit premises that the question is based upon: first, that the only really legitimate knowledge worth having is practical "real life" knowledge, second that anything which lacks an immediate, direct application is by definition impractical.
Followed by the seven reasons. As always, various folks have opinions to post as comments.

I agree with the general premise, even though I am not a particularly good exemplar of why studying math is inherently a good thing. (On the contrary, I'm sort of the "this is what happens when you don't" counter-example, having terminated my mathematical studies shockingly early, it seems in retrospect.) I would comment thusly:
  • Studying math is fun, just coz. I quit math early, but when I revisited it (in college, and later when my kids were busily bypassing my limited knowledge) I enjoyed it a heck of a lot more. As in, I enjoyed the homework a lot more than they did.
  • There is such a thing as "practical" math for virtually everyone: arithmetic (tax on a purchase, savings during a sale, tips in restaurants, fractions in everything); finance (compound interest); probability (Lotto odds, accident and disease risk); geometry and topology (carpentry, sewing; cooking (!)); and several more I can't think of at the moment. Obviously, mastering this kind of math is not what Eric necessarily has in mind, but these are all everyday applications that anyone would have a use for.
Anyway, well worth a read.

PS I am extremely antipathetic to the question "Why do we have to study this?" since the answer is basically "Because people smarter than you have found good use for this knowledge." Oh, well.

[categories]   ,

|